Morning Journal: National Wingnut Association, How Straight am I, Efficiency of Dating Thin Sisters, Medicaid Expansion & Immoral Governors, Honorable Use of Military, Premature Obamacare Attacks, Shoot Me if, Self Honesty, Ignorance Paradox

My hyper-controlled vegetable garden, 2002.

1. One day the National Rifle Association will be remembered with a fondness similar to our memories of the Ku Klux Klan or the cigarette makers.

 2. I'm so straight (sexually) that when I see a set of male genitals in pornography ([alternative text here] I've heard about male genitals being in pornagraphy), the first thing I think of is "the space program needs more funding." And perhaps "I haven't been fishing in a while." Sometimes I think "fire fighting is cool."

 3. Thirty years ago as a young invincible I was an occasional black-out drinker. I think I once went to an ac/dc concert in Washington D.C. and blacked out most of the experience. I was with a guy named Chuck who I had been hanging out with and getting into various trouble with for several months. Chuck knew these two thin sisters (I said t-h-i-n not twin sisters) and I think they came to the concert with us. But they were not just thin, they were Karen Carpenter thin, like they had been eating food void of nutrition like rocks for breakfast and lunch all their lives. Anyway, taking both of them to the concert was not a problem with dating economics since the two of them together were like one person. Like one mouth to feed, half as much alcohol for each of them, half has much attention needed to be paid to either of them. Unfortunately I don't recall if I was intimate with either at one time or both of them at the same time. That memory is just one half naked blurry reasonably sized woman, who I knew were actually two skinny women!  And what a shame to see a great concert like ac/dc and black-out the event!

4. Being a stubborn conservative governor who has refused to accept the expanded Medicaid program funds is like refusing to install poor citizens' vehicle air bags even though doing so would be free of cost. Where you know the bags could save lives and unnecessary suffering if installed. How many busted heads occurring among what segment of the population are enough to keep under the radar of the press and then get-away with - governors assholes? For these governors it's about sticking to their anti-federal government philosophy of conservatism at the cost of the suffering of the silent population who could use that Medicaid funding a great deal.

5. If I were commander in chief of the most powerful and globally extended military force in the world I would . . 

A. Shift hundreds of billions in annual Pentagon funding into research and development toward a large and effective space fighter fleet. Hundreds of single pilot multiple use fighter craft that can fly very fast in atmosphere or space, that can land vertically, that can pivot 180 degrees upon an enemy. I would involve all capable nations in following suit. Not only could we then defend the planet but the craft can be the workhorses of space, towing everything needed in space from satellites to equipment and personnel to colonize the Moon and Mars. They could also destroy incoming planetary bodies like asteroids and meteors, or falling spacecraft. Technical hint for the pentagon: pilots encapsulated in fluid can take far more g-force especially if that fluid container is computer pressure by chamber controlled!

B. Intervene with troops or air support in other nations only in these circumstances:

1. Starvation and or genocide is occurring due to war. In this worthy and honorable cause I would use all available military means, beginning with taking-out whatever leadership is causing the suffering, to alleviate the suffering. I would establish two or more international refugee zones which would be strongly militarily guarded near each point of refugee populating. If a warlord needs to be taken-out I would revive the mass paratroop drop behind enemy lines technique of overwhelming the enemy. 2. If a burgeoning democracy is falling apart and military solutions could keep it together. For example in Egypt in 2012, I would have supported the current regime, as corrupt as it may have been, because elections were coming. I would have rapidly deployed a carrier battle group to the coast of Alexandria to let the Egyptian army know we do not support revolt. I would do these things because having as many democracies as possible in the world is the single best known way to reduce the frequency of war and thus human suffering. A worthy and honorable cause and a good use for unbeatable military power.   

 6. For any conservative group or think-tank to exclaim "Obama care has been a failure," is just stupidity. It implies the program is in full effect - and the truth is far from it, as tens of millions of uninsured have yet to brave their way forward and sign-up. It implies that enough of the program has been working long enough for experts and economists to have any opinion worth any merit - or an opinion that can be deduced true by reasoning. Imagine you're a conservative in America, you actually want millions to not have good health care, because they'll have shit insurance or none under conservative proposals for Health Savings Accounts, and other such rubbish speculative health care delivery systems.

7. This is my declaration of sound mind: If I'm dying, and I indicate that I'm going to heaven, somebody please shoot me or smother me with a pillow. Because I'll be acting like a delusional fool during my last time on Earth, and I won't go-out a blithering fool.

8. It is also lying to be dishonest with your self. Therefore we must show respect to ourselves and get "intellectually honest," about everything of which we deceive ourselves about. We must discover these lies and get them the f*&k out.

9. Example of mental illness stigma by institutional delivery: "I told my psychiatrist something a few weeks ago and she looked at me like I was crazy!" Or, "I saw my new physician the other day, he looked down at my chart, then looked up at me like I was crazy!" Or, "I asked the shoe sales lady if she had it in a wide size, she looked at me like I was crazy!"

10. The great and unsolvable paradox preventing human progress involves ignorance. That a great many people do not know they have it makes decreasing ignorance like trying to drink a lake fed by a river. So we must find a way to educate all humans using high technology beginning at the fetal stage of development, ensuring that children are born knowledgeable. Unfortunately many of the new smart-babies will be smart-assed and manipulative and conniving little shits. Perhaps we could send those babies to colonize Mars?   

The Priority to Accomplish as Much Good as Soon as Possible Must be Public Campaign Financing Now

Unrestricted sums of money given to political candidates cannot be considered free speech if the ability to speak in the same manner and level of access of the majority of citizens is impossible, and the unaffordable speech of the masses attempting to express ideas is made valueless to our candidates and irrelevant. This is not freedom despite the warped perspective of Republican dispensers of empty and non reasonable rhetoric and evidence less economic hypothesis. It is the legal corruption of the tool of democracy. It is definitely a form of oppression of the masses. Now all the masses of the United States have left is their anger, their ideology, their philosophies. Precious things thought to be protected by the first amendment, thought so by James Madison when he wrote it. Money and it's spending in political campaigns was not a concern of the founders, read on.

It is time we give something kind to the American voter which also ensures democracy as a sound government structure we can all trust, for the first time in our history. It is time that every vote really did count - but not just every vote, every person whether he or she chooses to vote or not. A thing the founders never thought would be necessary.

The founders were men who foresaw that only white land owning and merchant men would be voting and that campaign funding would never be an issue due to it's largesse because that scenario was unfortunately, not conceived of. Because, campaigning at the time involved free activities like letter writing to newspapers, speaking publicly and so forth. Our constitution lacks the following seemingly as if by purpose but more likely due to eighteenth century ignorance and an innocent narrow view (normal for it's time) of what the future might be: no mention of any limits or ceilings on campaign money that could be raised by candidates and sitting politicians. No mentions of who or what controls that purse/bank. No restrictions of from who, from what interests, from conflicting interests. No mention of who keeps the money after a campaign. This absence must have been noticed when a conservative Supreme Court ruled in the affirmative for Citizens United vs. the United States.The Super Pacs now born of that decision will make democracy further and further from representative to us all. A point not understood by the conservative court.

We have proven beyond a doubt that our current electoral campaign finance system mostly does not work for anyone but the wealthy. This inequity is why United States representative democracy has never truly been in place. If you think that historically what works well for the wealthy, works well for you in the long run, then you may not agree with this solution.

The route to Public Campaign Financing has to be a new Constitutional Amendment, because obviously Constitutional amendments are not ruled unconstitutional except by another amendment. 

The anger and disappointment over our Supreme Courts' decision in Citizens United verses the United States, is swelling the ranks of democratic activists and unifying them toward a goal of a Constitutional Amendment to repeal Citizens' United.  I say whoa. Citizens United is horrible, but lets use this opportunity to both fix Citizens United and correct something long over due that will reap benefits for democracy well beyond just the repeal of Citizens United. Public Campaign Financing would remove the target for every corporation and superpac benefiting from Citizens United. Many democracies around the world are succeeding using their own form of Public Campaign Financing. There have been several periods of time in our recent political history where Public Campaign Financing was offered by many people as a solution to the corruption and misrepresentation and under representation that occurs constantly under our current system of campaign financing. The call for Public Campaign Financing is so old it is almost traditional American rhetoric.


"The greatest moral question which now confronts us is: Shall the trusts and corporations be prevented from contributing money to control or aid in controlling elections?" 
                                                         
-Defeated Presidential candidate Judge Alton Parker, 1904.

I support overturning Citizens United - and it's underlying warped philosophy that corporations are people. But it is foolish to NOT make use of the huge energy and anger in all political parties currently to finally create Public Campaign Financing, which would cause Citizens United to become MOOT and introduce full representative democracy where over 100 million non voting eligible citizens finally become represented. The advantages of PCF are numerous and the arguments against these advantages are very hard to make. The whole proposal for PCF makes so much logical sense it makes the effort to introduce a constitutional amendment to defeat Citizens United look trivial in comparison.

Candidate campaigning has been tainted by the dollars of the few wealthy over the interests of the poorer many since our inception. I don't need to mention examples of the corruption, the resulting absence of representation, the conflicts of our interest created by massive dollar amount campaigns. I won't mention the many examples of decades of fighting against large money donors to get our congress to do something, anything. I don't need to mention that after that fight, when we think we are about to get something with all of our interests in mind, that we get watered down half measures of legislation that are partially representative of us all.

Nearly 50% of our federal representatives, 261 members of Congress, are millionaires. http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20023147-503544.html Among us the numbers of millionaires are 3 - 4%. The first priority on their first day as elected representatives is to start raising money to get re-elected. A US Senator from a rural state will have to raise on average $20,000 per week once elected to prepare for re-election. That Senator will have to ration his time for meetings with those most able to re-elect him, not time finding solutions to our problems. Our two presidential candidates will spend nearly $1 billion on this election, up hundreds of millions of dollars from the last general election.

How much are we spending on elections? From Ryan Borek, Executive Director, Take A Stand PAC: "In 2010, researchers believe approximately $4 Billion was spent on the midterm election. 2008's Presidential Election cost over $1.7 Billion not including other elections, and likely topped over $5 Billion. The off years such as 2009 tend to lag significantly behind at around $2 Billion. The average US Senate race costs around $4-7 Million, with the average US House race costing $2-6 Million. State elections cost significantly less, usually around $500,000. Local elections can cost as little as $5,000 depending mostly on filing fees. It is difficult to ascertain exact costs as the system is not designed to keep track of state or local spending in any central location. You can find the exact spending for any single federal candidate at FEC.gov, however you would need to contact each individual state's election office to find the spending on a state or local candidate."

Per person based on current population and the above estimate of $5 bilion per year, a standard General Election would cost approximately $15.87 each. Who would not be willing to pay $16 per year to better ensure real representation for all of us, without conflicts of interest, without corruption of our elected officials?

In the ruling of the Supreme Court in the now famous "Citizens United," corporations were given the status of an individual in the practice of petitioning government their grievances and exercising free-speech. Essentially in the invisible center of every corporation lies a being, a being that pays taxes and wants legislation that favors them, as if they were individuals with unalienable rights like us.

This interpretation of free speech and who or what can participate monetarily in our elections was greatly damaging to representation in that it tipped the scales even more toward more robust representation of those of greatest means. It was not enough that the entire executive board of a corporation is entitled to use free speech and vote their minds as individuals, now an invisible new being in the middle of the conference table is able to pool its larger amount of resources and out-bark the general populace or any target population they may, thereby manipulating all of our futures unrepresentatively.

Enter the only best answer: the 100% public financing of every electoral campaign in the United States of America. Below is educated speculation of what happens after Constitutional Amendment number twenty-eight that mandates this change, has gone into effect:

1. With literally no more purse for the coinage of the lobbyists to be dropped into at our elected representatives offices, the lobbyists for corporations and unions and smaller governments get real jobs in the private industry and vanish in one day from Capital Hill never to be seen again, so long as the 28th Amendment is the law of the land. Citizens United and all other rules as they pertain to corporations or any lobby, will matter no more because all campaign material and money must come from the public fund only, and gifts to our representatives and candidates will remain illegal.

I explained to Tuvok as best as I could (in dog spkeak)
the methodology of our current campaign
financing system, but all I could get
from him was "dog bone." So there it is,
Public Campaign Financing will definitely
 lead to increased dog bones. Because when
 working people are finally represented fairly,
wages will rise to meet the needs of every family,
 and increased packages of dog bones will be purchased.

Some lobbyists find a job in a related field practicing an American tradition: marching around all day outdoors in front of the capital building carrying protest signs advertising slogans about issues. No wooden handles allowed guys! Stay within the yellow tape please!

2. Do the corporations or the unions still have free speech, representation, the ability to give money toward campaigns? Yes of course! The public fund for electoral campaigns is also contributed to from corporations made of individuals who pay a flat rate toward the public campaign fund, just like the citizen who pays the same exact rate who may own a small house right-next-door to the multi-billion dollar corporation. If a corporation is a person and that person is entitled to the free speech act of giving to a political campaign, then under Public Campaign Financing that person/corporation has given, with taxes, toward the political campaign, just like every body else under the new 28th Amendment.

This is a new shared representation in free speech ability the nation has never known. The "individualist" corporations' argument will then have to be "we have more money so we want to be able to give more money because we are more important to the nation than the little people!" And perhaps "This is not unfair to the great majority of the population!" Opinions that will be hidden from us and that the public would find distasteful.

3. Equal campaign funding for equal candidates everywhere. Knowing that your competition has not one more dollar than you do to spend on the campaign, makes the issues and your position on them far more important than ever before in determining a winner. As a representative you won't know who to support more on any one issue unless you delve into your constituency for real information on the issues. Information you then use without influence in dollars, while keeping in mind that it's your stand on the issues that will get you re-elected.

4. Equal political air-time. The media will have to abide by the rules just like individuals. They can not use outside funding for any political propaganda unless it is from the Public Campaign Fund. And they can not get that money until campaign time. Like Great Britain we have restricted the number of calendar days before the election in which television and radio and newspaper advertising can be displayed by anyone in favor of in opposition to a campaign or an issue of political purpose. Perhaps 60 days prior to election. When the millionaires' public relations manager calls the television network to try to gain advantage in an election, the manager would tell him or her "Sorry but you can't advertise for a political issue or a candidate until September 4th of this year and then you'll have to prove your money comes from the Public Campaign Fund. My hands are tied by the 28th Amendment. If you like we can interview you at any time, but your opposition gets an interview also."

Is it not time for the frenzied race to the top of Capital Hill lead by the wealthiest to end? How much more evidence needs to pile-up for us all to admit the system as we know it, as it's structured, does not work? The Founders did not imagine our present could become this bad, I'm sure. We are not the few land owner, white, businessmen voters and congressmen the framers did imagine, any longer. In attempting to fix our electoral system few if any better solutions exist. Any answer must eliminate the power of the big-money contributors and return our nation to the people.

But this seems unconstitutional! . . .

Keep in mind successful Constitutional amendments are not ruled unconstitutional except by another amendment. The purpose of the First Amendment is not damaged by Public Campaign Financing. The goal of representative democracy is shared and more fairly distributed, rendering the political speech concept of our free speech more representative and so more powerful than before.

If public funding of election campaigns is somehow unconstitutional then since 1976 checking a box on your income tax return that gives $1-2 to the Presidential Election Campaign Fund, is also unconstitutional. Because that is nothing more than what Public Campaign Financing does, it's our government managing and collecting a fund for election campaigns specifically. So, prove that philosophy unconstitutional.

Public-Campaign-Financing.Org

The clarion call out of the windows of our homes should be "It's my money and I want my politician back!"

Please sign the online petition! http://bit.ly/LCjp17

Please post critical and constructive criticism in the comments section below. I will try to answer every question.

Thank you. Grace on the United States.

The Human Plant Hybrid Cell Could End Hunger and Starvation

If necessity is the mother of invention then incorporating plant life into our own life in order to always eat is an idea that has surpassed its minimal requirement to be a necessity by leaps and bounds and must now become invention to save the world from hunger and death by starvation. I'll do the easy part. I have invented the concept in this article and I will name it:

Let it be named the Human Photosynthesizing Cell or HPC or HPHC for Human Photosynthesizing Hybrid Cell. 

We must invent it because we may never come close to feeding the entire world and terminating all that suffering using normal agricultural methods and this creation could do just that - eliminate hunger. We may for a very long time continue to have at least one billion people per day sleeping hungry every night somewhere on this planet. Hunger is the embarrassing emblem of humanity's continuing greatest failing. In just sixty years our population will double. We can not sustain ourselves at current population numbers, never mind how we'll do it when we are twelve billion mouths to feed on Earth. 

Science looks inside of nature when seeking answers and answering the huge problem of not enough food has always been about how to grow enough food, transport enough food, get enough food to the right people. It's time to look at nature again but not so deeply, we need to look right on the top of Earth's surface in plain view at the process of photosynthesis for carbohydrate production, yes leaves, plant cells, but within us, part of us.

~~~~~

It is my fading hope that we humans may reach a day when we have collectively realized that compulsion toward profits should never be allowed to intermingle with health and safety and the welfare of all. At that time, we may begin to care for ourselves as one community. We may then be able to feed the world and perhaps feed 12 billion people every day.

~~~~~

However, I see that as unlikely, as the pattern of our behavior makes this possibility very unlikely, unless a radical change occurs. That change may be a painful lesson. As we humans will respond to great pain, where we lack the ability to empathize with our inevitable painful future. We live in denial of the horrors of the future. 

This idea of incorporating plant life into our physiology is a way to avoid much suffering and great pain. We may not have to learn that lesson painfully. Science can help us to avoid this hard lesson. We can produce carbohydrate and nutrients, just as the plant life on this planet has been successful in doing since the time of the formation of eukaryotes. The single cellular, photosynthesizing, self-reproducing life forms who live on sun and the carbon in our atmosphere, charged with the electromagnetic energy of our parent star that sustains all life. 

It's time to become plant people and deliver a world wide blow to all suffering that will never be forgotten. No longer could power be declared and be lost and no longer could wars be fought over the amount of food absent or present of any people in any land where the sun shines onto flesh.

The new tissue will feeds us the ends of it's tiny growing leaves into our bloodstreams. Tissue that of course would turn our skin a translucent green like the forests or the beautiful green lawns we surround ourselves with- purposefully. 

We could provide our new skin its sustenance simply by swallowing plant fertilizer vitamins daily and making sure that we lay in, or work in, sunlight, or artificial sunlight for eight to twelve hours per day (for example). Who knows we may not have a need for green skin, perhaps science could control  the pigment gene for the new hybrid cell and we could all enjoy custom created skin tones that conduct photosynthesis and create carbohydrates and fiber for us to survive on for as long as we shall all live under the light of Sol.

It's not easy being green.

And yes you geeks reading this, the photovoltaic energy created in photosynthesis would not go to waste either, a small device could harness our new skin cells' billions of microscopic power-plants and charge our smart phones and other low power interfaces, perhaps our internal devices, while we lay in the sun.

We'll need an enzyme producing white blood cell to produce the interior leaf eating enzymes so we can digest the plant matter growing in our flesh. Creation of specialized cells from stem cells takes a front in priority of research in this line of discovery. It will be amazing, but it won't be as difficult as much of the amazing accomplishments we have already made. 

We want these conceptualized hybrid cells to last as long as a long living tree or large green plant would live, perhaps fifty to one hundred and fifty years. Low blood sugar and other biochemical events should engage a physiologic trigger which regulates the amount of leafy growth for the blood stream, in this way we are not over producing green leafy food when we do not need to. Scheduling dinner and having anxiety about locating food will never have to happen again.

We may not need the hybrid cells all over our bodies, perhaps just our hands and arms, or maybe even only our foreheads or scalps where the most light can reach for the most part of the day. Essentially the skin would have to produce enough leafy matter in our blood streams to amount to about two thousand calories per day.

I'm confident in human science that through collaborations of the best scientists, with someone creative pushing them who has confidence their goal, we could achieve the H/P hybrid tissue cell and end hunger on Earth. The hungry and the poor must get their implantations first and the anorexic western women and obese people of the world will have to wait.

The team of scientists who can make this breakthrough will be undeserving of our highest known award on Earth. We'll need to make a new award for these people. The honored and cherished Nobel prize given to brilliant discovers today will not be prestigious enough. 

Create the hybrid human/plant epithelial cell and feed the world. I know the devil is in the details, but this issue is far too important to allow scientists to claim "stumped" over. It's a true necessity dammit! Now let's invent - for our priorities, like this concept does.

#hunger #starvation #famine #drought #WHO #UNHRC #biologylesson #photosynthesis #hybridskincell #ideas #amwriters #weblogs 

Head and Body Transplants Coming

That's me, one day soon, on the left!

Heads up spirit of Mary Shelly! Once again a great science fiction writer has been brilliantly prophetic and inspired our modern era. Now let’s all practice saying “cephalosomatic linkage.” But if that name is too bothersome just say "head job," soon everyone will know what that means. If anyone has ever told you "you'll never get a-head in life!" And if it looks as if it's true, hope is now on the horizon, be patient. Just one thing however, to get a-head you'll have to lose your old one and possibly find yourself converted into a custom head toaster and on sale at a Bed Bath and Beyond store. Actually, that would not be a bad place to be be a toaster. The possibilities are headless and should be explored right now so we are prepared as a society.

       I am newly enlightened, we really are our heads! Because it is now affirmed that we certainly are not our bodies. That’s not to discount the importance of a good body. But how about a new good body every fifty years or so for five hundred years? Perhaps a body purchased on ebay or Amazon? A neuroscientist (brains and nerves) in Italy has published a paper that is causing a world wide conversation and inspiring some fifty thousand head jokes in bars and pubs and my house. In the paper he postulates that with current medical technology we could perform successful head transplants right now. Or more simply put: a body switch for the person who is the head.

A gold-mine dripping away!

        Primate experiments in the early seventies involving cephalosomatic linkage proved nearly successful except the spinal cord could not be fused and the experiments would be terminated. However, it was carefully noted that chimp A when awoken to his new chimp B body no longer craved bananas quite so much and he felt that handling feces with his hands was no longer appropriate given his circumstances, then he died. No one has picked up these experiments since. The doctor who authored the article says the new gelatinous bio bonding solutions, or the drool from a Great Dane, were what was needed to fuse nervous tissue, and those tools are here now.

 I thought it odd that the author of the article referred to the body as the “recipient” and the head as the “donor.” As if it was the body's decision to give itself to a different head. I'm sure that if my body had a choice it would choose the procedure, just to rest in peace and put an end to all the fish oil supplements and ridiculous no alcohol imported beer, and impulsive incessant nipple pinching.

       A danger to humanity is that we could end-up with a majority of our population with transplanted bodies. A mathematical problem with the procedure is that you have to cut off two heads to complete one transplant. If this becomes an affordable pattern throughout society we are looking at total extinction in less than one thousand years.  

     We will have to clone headless bodies to keep a-head of demand - or grow the bodies with heads but keep them really stoned and hooked-up to a Direct TV satellite dish until separation time. They'll probably watch cartoons on the Head Channel. Or because the information is useless, and the cloned heads have no real future anyway, they may enjoy FOX News.

     We may not have to clone if we look toward the animal kingdom for new/used bodies when the human pickings become slim. Imagine your pervert neighbor on the floor below you with a new giraffe body, walking around with his head twenty feet in the air seeing what everyone is doing. Questions.

     If we do succeed in placing animal bodies “underneath” new heads (“new” for the body), there will be many men choosing male dog bodies - like me maybe. The main motivation of course being oral sex with themselves just the way they like it every time. An age old dream of fourteen year old boys everywhere as has been discovered depicted in ancient Egyptian statues and hieroglyphics!

     What will scientists do with all of the heads that are severed from donor/recipient bodies? We'll have to throw them out if no one claims them. But new uses for disembodied heads will be invented so that "no good head goes to waste", like mixing them into dog food, horse food, cattle feed, senior citizens on Social Security food. Of course severed and dead heads can receive all kinds of electronic enhancements like computers, cameras and listening devices, audio alarm clocks for the bedside with RealVoice technology!  Their dead eyes and brains could be wired for motion detectors, traffic light ticketing cameras, heads would be helpful and cheerful bank ATM assistants or bank tellers dispensing not only cash but lollipops for the children as well.  Widows and widowers can get paid good money for their spouses bodies, and even get the head back with built-in artificial intelligence and a full suite of electronic conveniences and applications.  Funeral homes and morticians will have to add new Head Specialists so that families can receive loved one head retrofitting in addition to memorial services, all in one. New uses for heads would be inexhaustible. How about angry balls for hilarious bowling fundraisers, a different kind of baton for 100 meter relay racing in the Olympics, illuminated heads mounted on top of cars wired to dashboard computers that when in danger of collision will sound a ghoulish 110 db warning howl for extra safety (nothing like a second pair of eyes), finally a truly realistic looking fake passenger for the carpool lane, something for bachelors to hang from the front door on Halloween night - to absolutely keep trick-or-treaters away, fertilizers for smart-plants, something to beg for money for you while you sleep on the sidewalk, bi-optic head projectors with 3-D for winning Power Point presentations, a toy for the dogs with true emotional human reaction, suck out the brains and stuff a head with catnip - hours of feline fun, loud screaming artillery rounds to fire at supernaturally inclined enemies forcing them to lose bowel control and retreat and proclaim us the "demon nation" and then leaving us alone forever, if we pump refrigerant from one side of the head's brain to the other side then install a fan under it's throat . . finally instant personalized portable head air-conditioners for everyone! Stylish! This next one really freaks me out [readers skip this if sensitive to mental imagery] . . . feasibly a head could become re-aware in an alleyway in Brooklyn, his mouth dripping in personal lubricant and looking straight into a set of smelly genitals belonging to some guy named Waldo who wreaks of urine and whiskey. Don't laugh this is now a possibility, think about it, use your heads man!

     Look-out Romney family and other Mormons! You’ve been treating your bodies very well indeed. [Evil extended laugh].

Speaker Newt Gingrich. a.k.a. "Ol' Greasy face

One image: Someone is going to claim retired Congressman Newt Gingrich’s body complete with greasy potato chips in the stomach, ready for the new head's first meal!

     Scary scenario: Very old peoples' heads might get gorgeous bodies and then go to bingo night trolling for sex! Additionally, what if some young horny single man, inebriated from drugs or alcohol, agrees to go home with a very old ladies' head (VOLhead) with a young hot body, if she wears a bag over her head?  These very old heads

This article just went too far sweety!

might find that perfectly acceptable! But beware there will be occasional bag slippage or the accidental total loss of bag during sex with a  "VOLhead." Post traumatic stress disorder from fully visible VOLhead and VOMhead experiences may become a serious psychological crisis!

If a fully body transplant recipient falls in love with another full body transplant recipient and they want to get married, well that’s just “headgemony” plain and simple, and the Supreme court should rule on this abomination once and for all! 

     If a fully body transplant recipient falls in love with another full body transplant recipient, is it okay if they confess that they only love each other for their mutual new/used bodies? Will women still think guys like me are shallow?

     Congratulations Hell’s Angels, ride free dudes! Goodbye to helmet laws everywhere! Donor bodies will be in demand and

An inspiration to road warriors! This biker

now rides in the sidecar flopping

around and smiling allot.

But he's a great sport about it.

young fools without motorcycle helmets will be publicly encouraged to carry-on and let the wind “fly your freak-flag” for all to gaze upon in envy of your Bob Segerish independent and solitary man's man rogue ways!

"There I am, on the road again. There I am up on

the stage . . . ."

     What if a new body was a chronic masturbator during it's previous head and has good muscle memory and gets constantly aroused? How would we attend important meetings, drop off the kids at daycare, ride a bicycle, go to the beach, meet the president, give the weather report on television? Grocery shopping for male bodies won't be a problem, they would just walk closely behind the cart like I do. What if a new body wants to get high and toss Frisbees in the park and the head is just not into it? Perhaps if a head played video games which simulate many muscle memory activities that head could reduce the frequency of resurgence of muscle memory impulsiveness in used bodies? Consider.

          What about men who currently think for most of their lives with their penises? This is not just a cliché joke, it’s a real phenomena, I know because I went to rehab for it. It was a Hollywood twelve-step program starting with admitting you were powerless over erections and ending with your commitment to stare at a large poster of Phyllis Diller every morning for ten minutes for the remainder of your penises erectable life!  However, you have to really want to work the program. I guess did not work the program very well - because within three months after graduating the program I became oddly aroused by my Phyllis poster. When I called my sponsor about my problem, he came over to my apartment with two retired character actors (I forget what their names were but they were very familiar looking) and burned all of my Phyllis posters, even my hidden backup posters, in the backyard barbecue grill. It was to say the least, a traumatic experience I shall never forget, but if feels good to finally talk about it.

Thanks for the memories

Phyllis! R.I.P. dear

Will the new head think with a new/used penis that has been used to getting it’s own way? Or will the mysterious consciousness be absent because it has a new head? These type of difficult questions must be answered.

"ready . . set . . slice!"

 The author stressed that a razor thin and very precise cut of the necks was crucial in a successful procedure. ["keep your head very still and this won't hurt a bit."] I think he’s being pragmatic and utilitarian so that severed heads not getting new bodies can easily mount on a wall plaque, a fireplace mantle, a bathroom wall, or for athletes in icy nations to be able to slide them across the ice smoothly when curling. 

      Previously war-torn nations where populations are relatively young due to the massive elimination of adults in the older generation, will be prime pickings for youthful bodies. Nations like Iraq and Iran. We’ll make-up a good reason to invade both like we are good at doing. Their plentiful fresh hummus stuffed brown bodies

Arabs strengthening calves and buttocks!

will rain from the sky on us! What? I'm thinking a-head here! Besides they have very strong calves and buttocks from all that beach volleyball they must be doing - we have to begin to think about this shit!

       I have already begun strategizing to secure a new body and operating room time. I’m prioritizing this new goal second to my longstanding dream of creation of the ultimate weapon (to rule Earth of course). I have great sympathy for our nation’s dogs who are trapped in animal shelters, so I may stick-it out until the morality of dog body/head transplants is reconciled. I want my head to get a new human body but with a dog’s head on it along with my own. I like dogs. I’ll have one right next to me all of my life. Think about it, I’ll finally really know what it’s like to run after balls, eat anything off the ground, make garbage and mail delivery persons my mortal enemies. I’ll know new smells, and old smells in a new and deeper way. One small problem I foresee with my new dog head buddy, what if he wants to lick "himself" down there? One, he won't be able to reach it since he'll be on my body and I'm always too far away from reaching it, and two he probably won't do it like I like it anyway. And three that's f*cking gross!

This is a time that requires great introspection. The kind of pondering when our brain is thinking about our brain is the deepest thinking known to humankind. Don't let your head cave-in from over-introspection! Our very necks are at stake. 

Why U.S.A. Citizens Call Themselves Americans

The Americas

A few years ago I was walking with a pleasant and smart middle-aged Hispanic woman from Guatemala. When in conversation I had referred to myself and my countrymen as "Americans" she corrected me quickly for using the name.  I understand her annoyance and I was aware of the identity related geographic schism in titles when she stopped on the sidewalk, turned to face me and began to berate me in childish terms about geography and national titles.  I had hit on one of her pet peeves and she was hyped-up over it and during her fast talking passionate response I could not politely interrupt.

"You see there are three Americas, there is North America, where you live, and there is Central America where I'm from, and there is South America where many people live. We are Americans also, not just you. We call ourselves by our nation, I am Guatemalan, some people are Bolivian, or Brazilian, but they are all Americans too."

We quickly entered the building we were walking toward and I never had a chance to even say "I know, I know! I'm not another ignorant American!" It was a busy day and I let her go and never followed up. But here is what I would have said to her:

"See here Polly Perfect, we use "American" because America is in the name of our nation. Is America in the name of your nation you hyper sensitive Guatemalan smarty-pants? None of the other countries in our hemisphere use the name in their titles. So when someone says I'm an "American" it's actually very well implied because they said nothing else to identify a different nation otherwise. Bolivians in Bolivia don't say I'm a "Bolivian American," but Bolivians in the United States of America do say so. It's because of our name, and despite what you think it's not egotistical jingoist behavior you Guatemalan American nit-picker! Now go find something constructive to complain about and carry with you on your Guatemalan American back!"

The Trayvon Martin Killing - The Epitome of American Racist Fear and Cowardice

 

The Trayvon Martin killing is an example of the height of cowardice and fear and stereotyping and racial profiling. Additionally the so called "stand your ground law" and the State of Florida and the National Rifle Association for supporting it, and the inherent racism in the Florida legislature share blame for this tragedy because GZ (George Zimmerman) knew clearly of this law's existence and he likely felt empowered by it enough to aggressively approach the unarmed seventeen year old who was walking in the rain and was holding an Arizona Iced Tea and a bag of Skittles candy, who lived less than seventy feet away.

In an emboldened haze of reality television cop show action/adventure, with his trusty 9mm holstered snugly in concealment under his windbreaker, with several mixed martial arts lessons under his belt, and with an almost associates degree in criminal justice, this guy GZ took it upon himself to be the neighborhood sheriff, judge and juror, and he approached someone who was definitely not committing a crime who unfortunately likely had just as many firmly entrenched judgments and fears about persons like GZ, who Trayvon perceived as a "cracker," as he told a friend on his cell phone before GZ approached.

Only a cowardly person who has firmly established judgments and evaluations about types of people, different races and different cultures, who walks about with a concealed handgun, would turn a confrontation sought after by himself that did not have to happen into a physical confrontation with an unarmed person and then when on the bottom and losing the fight, turn that into a shooting death and then plea "self defense." Instead of claiming an accident which might have been accepted and then manslaughter charges would be faced, instead of wiping down his handgun and placing it in Trayvon's hand to cement a self defense scenario, he was still thinking of "stand your ground" during the time he waited about for the police to arrive at the crime and quasi self defence scene. GZ honestly thought his decision to shoot Trayvon was self defense, at the moment. He's in denial big time about his insistence. During the scuffle I think GZ was taken by surprise by the speed and intensity of Trayvons' violent response toward him [thin people can throw their arms faster]. I think that before GZ knew it he was on the ground, on his back and unsuccessfully blocking Trayvons' punches to his head. I think the fourteen shouts for "help," were GZ's cries in desperation which began the second he realized he was then losing the fight. GZ's father remarked upon first hearing the 911 recording with the fourteen cries for help "that is absolutely my son's voice . ." Where Trayvon's brother was not sure at first. GZ's voice had become his little boy's voice, I have heard grown men transform their voices into this little boy voice when about to die and crying out for their mother. Trayvon was winning, he was in a macho moment, he was defeating his fear in a moment he had imagined might happen to him, being  attacked by a cracker.

GZ is guilty of somewhere between first and second degree murder and of being a pussy pretending to be a cop. He should serve 2-5 years in a State lock-up for violent criminals. Because of his infamy he will not be a welcomed fellow inmate in a State prison which will have a disproportionately higher population of young African Americans than in the outside world. Therefore GZ will likely spend allot of time in solitary confinement for his own protection. But I am conflicted. I do not wish solitary confinement for the worse murderer among us because it is a form of legal torture by the state and I wish prisons would find an alternative to this mental torture. Of ex-convicts having been in solitary two out of three men lose their minds and slip into an environmentally induced schizophrenia complete with chronic bad hallucinations, delusions, voices, nightmares and etc.. I hope that his guards let him out for fresh air at least twice a day, to reduce the effect of the torture.

July 14, 2013:

Won't have to worry about GZ getting tortured by solitary. Son of bitch got off Scott-free! Race was not allowed to be discussed in deliberation or in the courtroom and that was a grossly unfair decision. Only one minority person was on the jury and no African Americans! Trayvon's peers were not part of that court at all. The Stand Your Ground Because You Have a Gun and You are Naturally a Frightened Coward law has to go! The gun madness has to end. Bullets and shells should cost $20 each right f*cking now! We should do that because that's how much we should show that we love our children. The cops need to be disarmed also for all of our safety. We could start hiring officers who are mature enough emotionally to truly realize and accept their risk of death and actually have balls and are willing to take risk before impulsively firing their firearms/penises at unarmed people. 

"This observer of social injustice rests your honor."