reading popularly now . .

Time Travel Wish can't get no satisfaction! No money to promote discovery, bummed.

Time Travel Wish can't get no satisfaction! No money to promote discovery, bummed.
4.28.16 request for communication answered. Undeniable circumstance and physical evidence.

2 undeniably related communications.

2 undeniably related communications.
2 undeniably related communications

Now IT IS VISIBLE for the WORLD to SEE and have HOPE!

Now IT IS VISIBLE for the WORLD to SEE and have HOPE!
Now IT IS VISIBLE for the WORLD to SEE and have HOPE!

an amateur can spell amatuer either way he likes at Time Travel Wish and Paradox One, the discovery

an amateur can spell amatuer either way he likes at Time Travel Wish and Paradox One, the discovery
True: Successful before it was created, Time Travel Wish and Paradox One, the discovery


Saturday, April 5, 2014

Young Guns Military is No Longer Needed

For this Memorial Day: This is a solution to the suicides and the many domestic and family issues and the vast isolation from society that a veteran feels - who has joined while young. Then gets home and finds society does not understand, he or she can not adapt quickly enough and by seemingly no choice of their own begins to destroy their own lives in that battle for acceptance. An acceptance an older veteran who has already lived as an adult in society, does not experience.

Please read this with this solution in mind. Thank you. - James.

By raising the minimum entrance age into our military to twenty-five years old, we could greatly reduce many problems involving the quality of the lives of military personnel and the cost of the problems associated with those lives. In our ancient world, the need to assure military populations are large existed. It no longer exists. So, we no longer need to pluck youthful freedom and the trials of the early years of adult discovery from our young people lives and put guns in their hands. Additionally it would be ethical and prudent to ban the entrance to anyone with a dependent/child.
The military does not have to be a social services machine for young people learning how to live with themselves and others. The military should not have to enforce responsibility among developing young adults. It's time for a military which is far less parental. An institution  which values personnel without emotional baggage. Not one that instead will expending hundreds of millions in tax dollars, on reigning in grown-ups not yet quite there. We could instead spend a greater percentage of our military funds on strictly military and far less on social services.
This plucking of youth is no longer necessary while our planet's population has reached seven billion. There is no shortage of strong and healthy men and women of more mature age to volunteer in our military. There is no shortage of childless men and women to conduct battle either.
Most veterans, young and old, will tell you proudly, something like "After I joined after high school, my years in the military honed me into the person I am today!" I ask to counter this statement "So what did it cost the taxpayers during these developmental years, becoming the person you are today?" I would add the question "Was it not more difficult to teach you and train you, than it would have been, say if you were twenty-five and not just eighteen?" And "Would you have had an easier time of it had you been twenty-five when you went in?" The answers should be, "Yes my immaturity cost my government a lot." And, I guess the older guys seemed to pick-up things better and have an easier time of it, overall."
What would we get in a mature military? Mature and smarter and wiser personnel who have confidently made-it to the post developmental age of twenty-five. Consider, the male brain is still in development until the age of approximately twenty-two! We'll have new personnel very likely to already have their civilian life planned when entering service. Many personnel may have already completed college and even began their career which they may be confident they can return to after service.
It was recently pointed out to me by an older baby boomer that leadership was largely missing in the Vietnam war and that was a frequent complaint. In that war, it was common for a platoon to have a young officer assigned to lead them in combat. An absence of trust and confidence in these baby-faced officers was immediately sensed in unit. This trust and with it confidence in leadership was rarely achieved with these young leaders. Not the case during WWII, where the department of war knew very well that mature enlistees be made sergeants and lieutenants non-com. The Department of War, figured-out, that they statistically better would perform as respected leaders in their units, far more so than the newly shaving wearers of bars.

Some ideas:
We could pay college tuition and a stipend to young people under twenty (still time to complete a four-year degree) who contract with the military to a term of service beginning at age twenty-five. We could then at age twenty-five re-offer the ability to fulfill their contract or pay the tuition with interest, within for example 10 years. It's a win-win for society economically and educationally and for all other reasons a mature military would quickly reveal. Imagine a mostly college educated fighting force! A platoon of wisdom and heavy firepower, where several members are qualified to take the lead. It would be a very lethal group of soldiers indeed.
We would get personnel less likely to violate code or commit crimes. A great reduction in events such as, assaulting each other or fragging each other, less engaging in brutality and torture against a prisoner. Perhaps, personnel would be more likely to fully identify a family or a wedding party before pushing the fire button from 5,000 miles away in a small steel building?
Domestic abuse among military families and single young people would be greatly reduced with a mature armed service. Domestic abuse in the military has risen sharply. In the seven extra years a an 18 year-old has to live his or her civilian life, they will be far more practiced at all relationships. Even having likely already experienced a crisis with a friend or loved one, or several crises in relationships. We learn with practice, so why make our military a relationship learning grounds? We get personnel who have life skills, because they may have been living on their own for several years of their early twenties. We get people with adapted social skills, who have learned the benefits and consequences of young adult relationships.
No arrest record should be present, as usual, for our new twenty-five year olds. The seven years of living as a young adult with no arrest record is a great measure that that recruit will likely never have trouble with the military police.
We'll get personnel less likely to go awol as they will know more of honor and commitment than our young military. At twenty-five our personnel will be less likely to abuse alcohol and other substances. As the legal experimentation with alcohol years will be behind the twenty-five-year-old volunteers. Pride and honor will more likely be understood and it's merits practiced on the battlefield more so with a mature military. Far fewer personnel will be only patronizing the meaning of honor, and may think it means doing what you're told and adherence to code and loyalty to your comrades.
The well known early twenties diagnoses of bipolar disorder and clinical depression and schizophrenia, will have likely already occurred before age 25, those personnel receiving psychiatric diagnoses, of an underlying condition, through the military medical system, will become fewer and furthyer in-between.
We get personnel less likely to impregnate and become pregnant. If a young adult has not learned the benefits and responsibilities of birth control use by the age of twenty-five, they should not get into the United States military. We get personnel less likely to have dependents like a young spouse and babies, a condition thats stresses the soldier. Pregnancy surprises and mistakes are the domains of young people and teenagers predominately. During service, these young families cost our government a great deal, in healthcare, housing, daycare, PX resources. No longer does society condone young families. But when they happen we all embrace the young couples and adore their children anyway -  because that's natural and very human. But the military is not their extended family and an obligation to care for them must be forgotten as an old tradition. A pre twenty-five-year-old who has their heart set on a military career, will likely, keep in close mind that they won't get in if they have a child.
Perhaps a rule that the military will not extend benefits and services to service person's dependents until 5-10 years in service is reached? Allowing an encouragement for career followers to achieve a family as stable family.
The military doesn't teach life skills and that should not be their business. While our people are fighting our wars for us, they are also not living in a dominant society, which is a factor in the known difficulties and hardships a veteran young adult encounters. Imagine having to catch-up with society after years of military life. Being still young and having to learn living skills, like applying to jobs, getting into a college, feeding and housing your young family in a very job competitive and low paying economy. Imagine, finding out you are ignorant of much of life's non-military facets? But there you are out in the thick of it. It must be very depressing for many. We should not be surprised that as of this writing the pentagon's figures for veteran suicides is averaging now 22 veterans per day and this is very disturbing. With twenty-five-year-old personnel, this misery will be greatly reduced as older young adults are more likely prepared for a complex and tough society in and out of military life.
Not being prepared to be a close witness to something horrific in war makes acceptance more difficult, this is more often a summary in the description of a post traumatic stress disorder sufferer. A military person who is experiencing the memory of an event which haunts him or her is not moving-on in life. The twenty-five-year-old has had several more crucial developmental years in which to contemplate his or her acceptance of the horrors we humans are capable of. His or her choice to risk being close to these horrors is far clearer. The situation they may place themselves in, more thought-out by proxy of the years of real life they have lived prior to their service. Age is not the always the predominant factor in PTSD, but young age is there consistently. The misery of PTSD occurrence would be greatly reduced with a mature military.
I see only benefits to our nations' defense from having a mature military at this time. If we had a shortage of able-bodied people in society, I could reason that we need that young blood to be military personnel. But that's not the case and likely never will be again as our population is so large.

#military #recruits #younggi #washouts #privates #army #navy #airforce #marines #youngguns #freshrecruits #pentagon #bacistraining #parisisland #bootcamp #youth #enlistee #veterans #vetsuicide #suicide #domesticabuse #brigg