reading popularly now . .
This hypothesis was first published on this weblog in the winter of 2013 and has been withdrawn from public view due to the author's...
Medicine to Live is a Social Welfare Case for Eminent Domain over Big Pharma In a short time, the cost of living (being alive) has skyro...
NASA did much more than send people to the moon in the great era of spaceflight that they brought to us. Both my parents worked at...
My Smoke and Carbon Monoxide Detector Detector Detector and Room Humidity and Temperature Detector Reporter and Wifi Transceiver Alarm AppIn the category of . . Title? Did I Tell You About My Smoke Alarm? The LEEO device, Comedy; practice titles: Great New Redun...
I f necessity is the mother of invention then incorporating plant life into our own life in order to always eat is an idea that...
Tuesday, July 25, 2006
If a weapon of mass destruction of a size larger than a suitcase or a trunk, is introduced into the United States by those who would harm us, it will be through our shipping ports. Consider, if a terrorist gets his nuclear bomb or bio chemical weapon, shipped in a crate, and that crate tucked into the rear corner of a container the size of a tractor’s trailer, and that container sitting in a parking lot waiting to be inspected or passed over. That is the optimal time of detonation, at the port, as soon as it arrives at the port. Since all American shipping ports are within sight of major cities, just getting to the port, is adequate for the terrorists. Our current, loose and barely accountable, and barely efficient inspection arrangement at all of our ports will not save us. “Foolish” is what we’ll be called after the detonation, and it will be ourselves doing the name-calling, as well as our enemies. The problem is not how to protect our ports so the ports won’t be a route for harming us, the problem is where we locate the ports for inspection purposes. We locate inspection ports at sea.
Three wet-docks each the size of a sports complex manned by the United States Coast Guard can inspect, by order and force, all shipping that crosses oceans with intent to dock in the United States. Ships routing themselves around the inspection docks will be chased and apprehended. One inspection dock should be located in the Gulf of Mexico. One each in the Atlantic and Pacific oceans, centrally located and their distances between ports divided by traffic use at those ports. Each inspection dock should be at least one hundred miles from coasts.
No private contractors should get their sticky fingers on this. The U.S. Coast Guard and only them, are the best personnel for this job. Unquestionable training and professionalism, combined with mission ideology and discipline make them the best. Well armed and well equipped with inspection technology, nothing harmful should get by them. The Coast Guard will be equipped to quickly sink a vessel should it be needed.
An appropriately measured tariff increase to imports sent by sea to the U.S. would compensate the entire program. For the shipping industry, the cost of this inconvenience will be negligible and easily retrieved via clients. This is not a gargantuan task like our building the Panama Canal, or the Interstate Highway System, or rebuilding San Francisco, or winning World Wars I and II. Its just a technological challenge, of reasonably large endeavourer.
For the American citizen, a level of trust in one large aspect of our security, not seen since decades past.
In 2016: The duality of my numbers and existence is becoming more clear these days. As the Time Travel Wish experiment has become more and more undeniable with each week's passing through time's ARROWS.Geez 1200 characters G? Wow that's great! Very cool.