11/1/2014 10:12 AM, Replying to Scotts’ G+ profile, image (above):
James M
Hi Scott. Thanks for the thought provoking image! hmm. I’m
confused as to how to connect these things. Clearly she’s speaking of children
in the quotation, not fetal or embryonic life. Is the photo collage message
supposed to connect wanting these two things as inconsistent with reasoning, or
inconsistent with a common logic derived within a sub culture?
Specifically, are you pointing out an inconsistency, or
hypocritical behavior, between being comfortable with the legal choice of aborting a fetus and
simultaneously wanting laws involving an assembled product, that is effecting
the populations of people, who are already alive?
Her quotation appears clearly to be advocating a higher,
highest, value among us for our children's lives. Not speaking at all, to the
issue of a woman’s choice to terminate an embryonic or fetal life.
If she’s like millions of women, she is capable of
compartmentalizing born and living lives, and embryonic and fetal life,
separately. Do you think women don’t do that?
I would also note that men often see your (apparent)
perception of connecting these things as morally equivalent, and much more so
than women see this connection. Observe the gender differences, in comments to
this image, you’ll see this.
Earlier post, August, 21st, 2014: Same image, different location:
Erik
Clueless.
Jeff
I just threw up in my mouth a little bit.
Rick
Idiot
Peter Yep. +Erin Thanks for
that.
Marty
Effin hypocrite!
Eric
Gotta love liberal logic.
Mary
Brainless.
Adam
I wonder if the shirt was supposed to say I had an abortion.
I regret it...
Yes I'm playing the devil's advocate ; P
Marty +Adam K
nice thought but its Gloria Steinem...google her for your
answer.
3D/Dova/Dawson
Guns are necessary to keep order and a feeling of safety
Brian
The hypocrisy of the left knows no limits.
Todd
If having a gun and ammunition would save my family, then we
should consider it.
bobby
Thus is another case of a night of passion that should have
ended in spit
James
We should strongly consider allowing her to self abort!
Adam +Marty
Lols : P
James P +James I'd pay to see that!
Stephen
If deporting one irrelevant has been can make our country a
better place then we should consider that!
John
Stupid contradiction. Not a fan of unstable people with
guns, I am pro choice. Am against people who argue ignorantly.
I bet she's for saving dogs and cats though.
Jackass!
John +Dawson
I disagree. My environment may be different than yours
though, so I can't say. I am in NY union construction and have seen the
young men in The African Village, Harlem, kill each
other every other day. The west side the pimps would shoot each other every
other day. And in all my fights, razors, box cutters, sledge hammers and
more have been used against me. No one died. They all have facial scars to
remind them to be polite. There is no lesson or respect learned by the
dead person.
Jeffrey
Another example of limousine liberal hypocrisy
Jeffrey
Blaming guns for violence is like blaming pencils for bad
penmanship or eating utensils for Rosie O'Donnell being obese
John +Jeffrey
Good comparison. Let me know when a teenager goes to a
school with a dangerous #2!
November 1st, 2014:
10:21 AM
James M
“Blaming guns for violence is like blaming pencils for bad
penmanship or eating utensils for Rosie O'Donnell being obese” - Jeffrey
I think it's the effect and frequency of these effects when
guns are used, not the violence itself, that always begins prior to their
intentional use, that really bothers people. So guns don't cause violence, of
course, neither do the rocks we throw at each other. But the rocks do not tear
through each others bodies at high speed in faster than a ¼ second, propelled
from separated distances, by the simple convenience of holding a thing upward
and pointing it. So addressing the tool used is very reason-able, if reducing
the suffering associated with it, is your interest.
